ANALISIS TULISAN MAHASISWA DALAM MELAPORKAN MASALAH KESEHATAN OLEH MAHASISWA KEPERAWATAN ITEKES BALI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37294/jrkn.v4i1.217Keywords:
analisis kesalahan, laporan masalah kesehatanAbstract
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: Masalah dalam menggunakan tata bahasa tidak dapat ditemukan hanya dalam bahasa lisan tetapi juga dalam bentuk tertulis serta kesulitan mahasiswa juga didasari dengan basic mereka yang tidak dari program studi bahasa inggris. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tulisan masiswa dalam melaporkan masalah kesehatan oleh mahasiswa keperawatan ITEKES Bali.
Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain ex post facto, laporan tentang masalah kesehatan yang dialami pasien adalah instrumen penelitian dari penelitian ini, Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh dan dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis kesalahan dari model Conder.
Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil penelitian kesalahan yang dibuat oleh sampel kesalahan kata kerja kelompok yaitu 74 (51,04 %), 59 (40,68%) kesalahan penghubungan subjek – kata kerja, serta 12 (8,28%) kesalahan dalam penggunaan kata ganti.
Kesimpulan: kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah kesalahan yang dibuat oleh sampel dominan dalam kata kerja kelompok. Peneliti berharap hasil pemelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai umpan balik untuk memutuskan teknik maju dalam mengajar tata bahasa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa.
Kata Kunci: kesalahan analisis, pelaporan masalah kesehatan
ABSTRACT
Background: Problems in using grammar cannot be found only in spoken language but also in written form. And the difficulties of students are also based on their basic not from English study programs. This study aims to analyze student writing in reporting health problems by ITEKES Bali nursing students.
Methods: This study employed an ex post facto design. Reporting on health problems experienced by patients were the research instruments of this study. This study employed a saturated sampling technique and was analyzed by using the error analysis method of the Conder model.
Results: Based on the results of research on errors made by a sample of group verb errors was 74 (51.04%), 59 (40.68%) errors connecting subject-verbs, and 12 (8.28%) errors in using pronouns.
Conclusion: The conclusion from the results of this study is an error made by a dominant sample in group verbs. Researchers hope that the results of this research can be used as feedback to decide on advanced techniques in teaching grammar to improve students' abilities.
Keywords: error analysis, reporting health problem
Downloads
References
Ary, Donald. et.al.2009. Introduction to Research Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
Ary, Donald; Jacobs, Lucy Cheser; Sorensen, Chris; and Razavieh, Asghar. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Eight Edition. USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bailey, Stephen. 2011. Academic Writing – A Practical Guide for Students. Taylor & Francis: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Batko, Ann. 2011. When Bad Grammar Happen to Good People (How to Avoid Common Errors in English. Careepress: Franklin Lakes, NJ.
Broughton, Geoffrey; Brumfit, Christopher; Flavell, Roger; Hill, Peter; and Pincas Anita. 2019. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Second Edition. Net Work: Routledge.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2010. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco State University: Addison Wesley Longman.
Brown, H Douglas. 2009. Language Assessment. San Francisco: University Press: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chambers, Ellie and Gregory, Marshall. 2009. Teaching & Learning English Literature. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Cohen, Louis; Manion, Lawrence; and Marrison, Keith. 2010. Research Method in Education. Fifth Edititon. London: routledgeFalmer.
DeCapua, Andrea. 2008. Grammar for Teachers. New York: Springer.
Dykes, Barbara. 2010. Grammar for Everyone. Australia Council: ACER press.
Ellis, Rod and Barkhuizen, Gary. 2009. Analysing Learner Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Esther, Uso-juan and Alicia, Martinies-flor. 2010. Studies On Language Acquisition. Berlin: Walter the Gryter GmbH & Co. KG D-10785 Berlin.
Flethcer, Glenn and Davidson, Fred. 2011. Language Testing and Assessment. The University of Leicester U.K: Routledge.
Harmer, J. 2011. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Heaton, J.B. 2007. Writing English Language Tests (Longman Handbook for Language Teacher). New Edition. New York: Longman inc.
Hinkel, Elil. 2009. Teaching Academic ESL Writing (Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, inc.
Jackson, Howard. 2012. Good Grammar for Students. London: SAGE
James, Purpura. 2009. Assessing Grammar. The Cambridge Language Assessment Series: J. Charles Alderson and Lyle F. Bachman.
Kane, Thomas S. 2011. The Oxford Essential Guide to Writing. United States of America: BERKLEY.
Langan, Jhon. 2010. Exploring Writing: Sentences and Paragraphs. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 1221.Longman Publication Ltd.
Renandya, Willy A and Richard, Jack C. 2009. Methodology in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosyadi, M. Arifian. 2012. Learning Material Junior High School Grade VII in Recount Text. Indonesia 2201408042.
Sattayatham, Anchalee and Ratanapinyowong, Pongrat. 2008. Analysis of Errors in Paragraph Writing. Silpakorn University International Journal: Medical Students from the Four Medical Schools at Mahidol University.
Utami, I Gusti Ayu Masari. 2011. Grammatical Error Analysis in Paragraph Writing of the First Grade Students of SMP Ganesha Denpasar in Academic Year 2010/2011. Mahasaraswati Univ: Unpublished.
Virginiya, Putu Tika. 2012. An Error Analysis of Recount Paragraph Writing Written by The Eleven Grade Students of SMAN 5 Denpasar in Academic Year 2011/2012. Mahasaraswati Univ: Unpublished.
Yule, George. 2010. The Study of Language. Fourth Edition. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Zemach, Dorothy E and Islam, Carlos. 2009. Paragraph Writing: From sentence to Paragraph. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
TEMPLATE JURNAL
